Body Mass Index Trends among a Cohort of Subjects Enrolled in Medication-Assisted Treatment Programmes for Opioid Use Disorder: Racial/Ethnic, Gender, and Age Differences
Body Mass Index Trends among a Cohort of Subjects Enrolled in Medication-Assisted Treatment Programmes for Opioid Use Disorder: Racial/Ethnic, Gender, and Age Differences
Review Data
Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal's area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for researchers?
A: Very good
Abstract & Keywords
Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?
A: Excellent
Goal
Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?
A: Very good
Structure
Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?
A: Very good
Tools and Methods
Q: Are the methods the author uses adequate and well-used?
A: Very good
Discussion & Conclusion
Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?
A: Good
Comments:
This study compares obesity prevalence in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) directly to people in the general population matched by race/ethnicity, gender, and age. The study is well designed and executed. The Methods and Results are adequately described. The Discussion offers a thorough and detailed analysis of the findings of the present study taking all the relevant literature into account. In Conclusion, this study found a higher overall prevalence of overweight and obese individuals in the cohort compared to state surveillance data. These trends may provide insight for future physicians to assess high-risk factors for proper prevention and intervention.
Literature
Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?
A: Very good
Author's knowledge
Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?
A: Very good
Length
Q: Is the paper's length adequate to the topic's significance? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?
A: Good
Figures & Tables
Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?
A: Good
Writing style
Q: Is it clear and understandable?
A: Very good
Further comments on the paper
Comments: This study aims to describe the prevalence rates of obesity in individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) from a cohort study and compare that to the expected prevalence that would be observed based upon New Jersey state and US population survey data. This study holds importance as it found significant differences in BMI prevalence in subjects enrolled in medication-assisted treatment (MAT) programmes compared to state and national trends. No collection of data regarding environmental factors such as physical activity, nutrition, and dietary habits and inability to verify the consistency of weight and height measurements due to collection of medical records from the MAT facilities come out as some of the limitations of this study.
Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?
A: Yes - Suitable to be published
If you have any questions or clarifications you can write to the journal.
Thanks,
Science Repository Team
Science Repository This email is restricted to the intended user. |
Science Repository - Support |
Author Info
Juhi Saxena Rachana Chilakapati Peter Attia Daniel M. Rosenblum Stanley H. Weiss
Corresponding Author
Stanley H. WeissDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
Article Info
Article Type
Research ArticlePublication history
Received: Fri 01, Jul 2022Accepted: Mon 05, Sep 2022
Published: Wed 24, May 2023
Copyright
© 2023 Stanley H. Weiss. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.JFNM.2022.01.01