Prenatal Diagnosis and Postnatal Treatment in a Case of Abdominal Obstruction and Polyhydramnios Caused by Amniotic Band Sequence

Prenatal Diagnosis and Postnatal Treatment in a Case of Abdominal Obstruction and Polyhydramnios Caused by Amniotic Band Sequence

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Good

 

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Good

 

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

 

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

 

Tools and Methods

Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Good

 

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Good

 

Comments: The Discussion illustrates the unusual antenatal presentation of amniotic band sequence (ABS) with complications causing fetal congenital clubfoot, chorioamniotic separation late-onset polyhydramnios providing relevant literature. This further describes the occurrences and causes of ABS in other cases and compares with the present reported case. Lastly, the authors’ advice to keep in mind the possibility of ABS in the presence of chorioamniotic separation and additional ominous ultrasound findings.

 

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Good

 

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

 

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

 

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Good

 

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Good

Comments: There are few issues found in the manuscript which are as follows:

·       In Background, 1st sentence, “malformations that can range from mild to life threatening” must be written as “malformations that can range from mild to life threatening conditions”.

·       In Case Report, 8th paragraph, 2nd sentence, “The circumferential amniotic abdominal scar was completely removed to freed deeply the abdominal fascia” can better be written as “The circumferential amniotic abdominal scar was completely removed to free the abdominal fascia deeply.”

 

Further comments on the paper

Comments: This case presents a 19-year-old woman with suspected fetal clubfoot at 22 weeks of gestational age (GA), despite of an unremarkable clinical history and low-risk pregnancy. This further illustrates the clinical diagnosis to confirm the chorioamniotic separation and unilateral clubfoot. It also provides the relevant surgical procedures for lowering the risk of complications in pregnancy.

 

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team

 
 

Author Info

Corresponding Author
Daniela Casati
Fetal Therapy Unit “U. Nicolini”, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buzzi Children’s Hospital, Milan, Italy

Article Info

Article Type
Case Report
Publication history
Received: Thu 11, Mar 2021
Accepted: Thu 25, Mar 2021
Published: Sat 03, Apr 2021
Copyright
© 2021 Daniela Casati. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.31487/j.SCR.2021.04.04