Accuracy of a Single Versus Multiple Trials of Novel Pacemaker ID Algorithm Mobile Phone App for Identification of Cardiac Devices

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal's area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for researchers?

A: Good

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Good

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

Tools and Methods

Q: Are the methods the author uses adequate and well-used?

A: Good

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them coherent?

A: Good

Comments: The Discussion puts forth the idea that PIDa came as accurate in the identification of the cardiac devices with a single trial and that it can support the usability and potential time savings of the PacemakerID app. The authors discussed the important factors for rapid pacemaker identification. Further, the limitations of the study have also been discussed. The conclusion states that PIDa holds a promising development in cardiology.

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Good

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

Length

Q: Is the paper's length adequate to the topic's significance? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Good

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Good

Further comments on the paper

Comments: The manuscript explains the accuracy of a single versus multiple trials of a novel Pacemaker ID algorithm mobile phone app for the identification of cardiac devices. The research provides a detailed explanation of the methods and results of the study.

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions or clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team