First Report of “Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy Variant” in an Injection Drug User with 12 New Organisms in Blood Cultures 17 Days after Admission to the Hospital
First Report of “Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy Variant” in an Injection Drug User with 12 New Organisms in Blood Cultures 17 Days after Admission to the Hospital
Review Data
Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for
researchers?
A: Excellent
Abstract & Keywords
Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?
A: Very good
Goal
Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?
A: Very good
Structure
Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?
A: Good
Tools and Methods
Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?
A: Good
Discussion & Conclusion
Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?
A: Good
Comments:
The subheading “Take Home Points” should be replaced with “Conclusion”.
The case description is adequate with well supported data. The Discussion states clearly that the presence of multiple environmental and skin microbes in blood cultures is suggestive of deliberate injection of contaminated material therefore making the case a variant of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. The conclusion is apt in stating that the materials brought by visitors to hospital rooms of drug addicts must be screened and new onset of unexpected symptoms should alert caregivers of the possibility of such abuse.
Literature
Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?
A: Very good
Author's knowledge
Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?
A: Good
Length
Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?
A: Good
Figures & Tables
Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?
A: Good
Writing style
Q: Is it clear and understandable?
A: Good
Further comments on the paper
Comments: This case study presents the first report of “Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy Variant” in an injection drug user with 12 new organisms in blood cultures, 17 days after admission to the hospital. The term Munchausen syndrome by proxy is when a person fabricates an illness on behalf of another. The injection drug user was admitted to the hospital for a spinal epidural abscess which was drained, treated with antibiotics and the patient was doing well, suddenly becoming very sick and febrile on day 17. Twelve new organisms in blood cultures of a hospitalized patient many days after admission has never been reported earlier.
Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?
A: Yes - Suitable to be published
If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.
Thanks,
Science Repository Team
Science Repository This email is restricted to the intended user. |
Science Repository - Support |
Author Info
Don Walter Kannangara Roopa Anmolsingh Dhyanesh Pandya
Corresponding Author
Don Walter KannangaraSt Luke’s Health network, Warren Campus, Phillipsburg, NJ 08865, USA
Article Info
Article Type
Case ReportPublication history
Received: Tue 22, Sep 2020Accepted: Fri 09, Oct 2020
Published: Fri 16, Oct 2020
Copyright
© 2023 Don Walter Kannangara. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.DDA.2020.01.05