Surgical Treatment of Tensile Effusion in Postoperative Cavity after Glioma Resection
Surgical Treatment of Tensile Effusion in Postoperative Cavity after Glioma Resection
Download Citation in txt
Download Citation in bib
Download Citation in ris
Author Info
Guo-Hao Huang Lin Yang Sheng-Qing Lv Xun Qin Yan Xiang Yao Li Yu-Chun Pei Zuofeng Zhang
Corresponding Author
Sheng-Qing LvDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (TMMU), Chongqing City, P.R. China
A B S T R A C T
Objectives: To explore the clinical surgical methods for the treatment of tensile effusion in postoperative cavity after glioma resection. Methods: Clinical data of 26 cases of tensile effusion in postoperative cavity after glioma resection were analyzed retrospectively. All 26 patients underwent surgical treatment, including 16 cases who underwent puncture and drainage (P&D), and 10 cases who underwent craniotomy decompression (CD). Among the cases of P&D, postoperative cavity in 7 cases were punctured through the burr hole for creating the skull flap for intraoperative resection of glioma, and postoperative cavities in 9 cases were punctured through a burr hole for the dura mater suspended under the skull flap. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was used to evaluate the consciousness status of the two groups of patients before and after surgery. Moreover, time of operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital duration, and postoperative complications were also adopted for evaluation of the merits of the two methods for treatment of tensile effusion in postoperative cavity after glioma resection. Results: The consciousness of the patients in both groups improved within 24 hours after the operation, and there were no death cases. In the P&D group, the GCS score within 24 hours after surgery was (14.38±0.20), the time of operation time was (7.81±0.64) mins, intraoperative blood loss was (6.25±0.56) ml, and postoperative hospital duration was (6.69±0.54) days. There were 3 cases with postoperative complications (1 case of puncture tract hemorrhage, 1 case of subdural hematoma and 1 case of intracranial infection) in the P&D group. All of the puncture tract hemorrhage and subdural hematoma did not require surgical treatment, and the intracranial infection was cured after antibiotic treatment and lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid replacement. In the CD group, the GCS score within 24 hours after surgery was (13.70±0.21), the time of operation was (124.10±8.96) mins, intraoperative blood loss was (260±30.55) ml, and postoperative hospital duration was (11.30±0.60) days. There were 2 cases with postoperative complications (both of them were with subdural hematoma), none of which required surgical treatment. The GCS score, time of operation, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital duration in the P&D group were better than those in the CD group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P >0.05). Conclusion: The P&D and CD for tensile effusion in postoperative cavity after glioma resection can both achieve ideal results, but P&D in line with the concept of micro-invasive neurosurgery was better than CD in terms of postoperative GCS score within 24 hours, duration of operative, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital duration.
Article Info
Article Type
Research ArticlePublication history
Received: Tue 18, Feb 2020Accepted: Mon 09, Mar 2020
Published: Mon 16, Mar 2020
Copyright
© 2023 Sheng-Qing Lv. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.SCR.2020.02.16
