Feasibility of Low-Seated Composite Aortic Conduit for Surgical Treatment of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: A Case Report
Feasibility of Low-Seated Composite Aortic Conduit for Surgical Treatment of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: A Case Report
Review Data
Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal's area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for
researchers?
A: Good
Abstract & Keywords
Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?
A: Good
Goal
Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?
A: Good
Structure
Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?
A: Good
Tools and Methods
Q: Are the methods the author uses adequate and well used?
A: Good
Discussion & Conclusion
Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them coherent?
A: Good
Comments: The Discussion gives an overview of the incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) with relevant literature. In addition, it illustrated the life-threatening conditions among patients with delayed diagnosis. Further, it discussed the operative management of endocarditis and the occurrence of complications by the aortic annular abscesses. Moving ahead, the case highlights the innovative modification of a common procedure that may provide a crucial reconstructive option in cases of advanced endocarditis. Lastly, the authors emphasized the importance of early diagnosis and involvement of a multidisciplinary care teams for appropriate treatment and meaningful post-operative recovery for patients.
Literature
Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?
A: Good
Author's knowledge
Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?
A: Good
Length
Q: Is the paper's length adequate to the topic's significance? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?
A: Good
Figures & Tables
Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?
A: Good
Writing style
Q: Is it clear and understandable?
A: Good
Further comments on the paper
Comments: The Case Report presents a 49-year-old male with a delayed diagnosis of infective endocarditis that resulted in extensive intracardiac destruction. The case highlights the feasibility of the low-seated composite aortic conduit for surgical treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis. The study put forth a novel, durable reconstructive strategy that would allow complete debridement of infected tissues.
Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?
A: Yes - Suitable to be published
If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.
Thanks,
Science Repository Team
Science Repository This email is restricted to the intended user. |
Science Repository - Support |
Author Info
Sandeep N. Bharadwaj Stephen F. Chiu Christopher K. Mehta
Corresponding Author
Christopher K. MehtaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Article Info
Article Type
Case ReportPublication history
Received: Sat 09, Jul 2022Accepted: Tue 02, Aug 2022
Published: Mon 12, Sep 2022
Copyright
© 2023 Christopher K. Mehta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.JSCR.2022.02.01