Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator and LifeVest Saving Lives in Challenging Scenarios

Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator and LifeVest Saving Lives in Challenging Scenarios

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Excellent

 

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Very good

 

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Very good

 

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Very good

 

Tools and Methods

Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Good

 

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Very good

 

Comments:

The Discussion stresses on the significance of the two cases described in this report by throwing light on the growing abundance of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators, which has resulted in a spike in the incidence of cases of device infections, sometimes even fatal. It also suggests appropriate measures for talking them. In Conclusion, these cases demonstrate the benefits of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and also the treatment of high-risk patients with WCD as a bridge-to-procedure, allowing full recovery before a new implantation.

 

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Good

 

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

 

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

 

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Very good

 

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Very good

 

Further comments on the paper

Comments: This manuscript comprises the reports of two cases of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, complicated by severe infections. These cases demonstrate the benefits of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and also the treatment of high-risk patients with WCD as a bridge-to-procedure, allowing full recovery before a new implantation.

 

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team

 
 

Author Info

Corresponding Author
Domenico Facchin
Cardiology Division, Department of Cardiothoracic Science, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy

Article Info

Article Type
Case Report
Publication history
Received: Thu 27, Aug 2020
Accepted: Fri 11, Sep 2020
Published: Thu 12, Nov 2020
Copyright
© 2023 Domenico Facchin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.JCMCR.2020.03.03