Home
/
Journals
/
Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
/
The Efficacy of a Novel Temporary Crown System
Open Access

The Efficacy of a Novel Temporary Crown System Marginal Seal and Structural Durability in Terms of Cyclic Loading - A Pilot Study

The Efficacy of a Novel Temporary Crown System Marginal Seal and Structural Durability in Terms of Cyclic Loading - A Pilot Study

Review Data

Purpose and Significance of Study: The Hi-tempo temporary crown system is novel, in that the restorations come in the pre-shaped form and are made from poly-lactic acid-based resin thermoplastic material. The use of such a system could potentially save resources such as chair time and costs of treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the marginal seal and structural durability of this system in terms of cyclic loading. Although the sample size is small, the lack of this information in the current literature makes this study significant. 

 

Fit with Scope of Journal: The manuscript is of very high interest for the journal Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 

 

There are many minor errors in the manuscript, which are listed below – 

In the Abstract section – 
Under Background and objectives – 
  • In the 1st sentence, “a” must be inserted before “lack” and “acid” before “(PLA)”. 
Under Methods – 
  • In the 2nd sentence, “consisting” must be replaced with “consisted”, there should be “:” after “consisting of”, “,” after “control group” must be replaced with “–”, “;” after “bis-acrylic” must be replaced with “,”, “,” after “Hi-tempo crown” must be replaced with “–” and “,” after “window type crown” must be replaced with “–”. 
Under Results – 
  • In the 1st sentence, “versus” is spelled wrong; “,” after “window” must be removed and “the” must be added before “Hi-tempo groups”.
  • In the 2nd sentence, “,” must be inserted after “crowns”. 
In the Introduction section – 

In the 1st paragraph – 
  • In the 3rd sentence, “,” must be inserted before and after “however”. 
  • In the 4th sentence, “the same as” must be replaced by “like”.
In the 2nd paragraph – 
  • In the last sentence, “they” must be removed, “should” must be inserted before “have low…”, “a” must be inserted before “low” and “should” be inserted before “have adequate…”.
In the 3rd paragraph – 
  • In the 2nd sentence, “and” must be replaced by “or” and “indirect-direct” must be replaced by “indirect and direct”. 
  • In the 3rd sentence, “the” must be inserted before “indirect” (same for the 4th sentence) and “.” Must be replaced with “,”. 

 In the 4th paragraph – 

  • In the 1st sentence, “techniques” must be made singular and “that” after “techniques” removed. 
  • In the 3rd sentence, “acid” must be added before “(PLA)”. 
  • In the 7th sentence, “,” must be inserted after “sustainable”. 

 

In the Materials and Method section –

Under Specimen preparation – 


In the 3rd paragraph – 

  • In the 3rd sentence, “and” before “fitted” must be replaced with “,”. 

 In the 4th paragraph – 

  • In the 1st sentence, “c” in 75℃ must be capitalized. 

 Under Cycle Loading – 

  • In the 1st sentence, “HZ” must be written as “Hz”. 
  • In the 2nd sentence, “stimulate” must be replaced with “simulate”. 

 Under Nanoindentation test – 

  • In the 1st sentence, “embedded” is spelled wrong. 

In the Results section – 

Under Marginal gap change – 

  • The word “biggest” at multiple places in “biggest discrepancy” must be replaced with “greatest”. 

Under Structural durability – 

In the 1st paragraph – 

  • “Survival” is misspelled. 


In the Discussion section – 

In the 2nd paragraph – 

  • In the 4th sentence, “stimulate” must be replaced with “simulate”. 
  • In the 4th paragraph – 
  • In the 6th sentence, the words “As well as this” do not make sense. 

 In the 5th paragraph – 

  • In the 3rd sentence, “temporary the” must be replaced with “the temporary”. 
  • In the 5th sentence, the word “raise” is misspelled. 

 In the 6th paragraph – 

  • The 2nd and 3rd sentences must be merged at “groups, whereas”. 
  • In the 6th sentence, “than” is misspelled. 
  • In the 7th sentence, “situation” must be plural. 

 In the 8th paragraph – 

  • In the 7th sentence, “build” must be replaced with “built”. 
  • In the last sentence, “interproximally” is misspelled. 

 In the 9th paragraph – 

  • The last sentence must be reconstructed as “Therefore, in future, studies on a bigger sample size (of at least 10 specimens per group similar to previous studies in this area of research cited in the literature) is recommended (Tjan and Grant, 1987; Ehrenberg et al., 2006).” 

 

Author Info

Caitlin Richardson Joanne Choi John Neil Waddell Linda Duoduo Zhou Liza Yelyzaveta Tykhonova Maykon Dias

Corresponding Author
Joanne Choi
Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Article Info

Article Type
Research Article
Publication history
Received: Mon 02, Dec 2019
Accepted: Wed 08, Jan 2020
Published: Tue 28, Jan 2020
Copyright
© 2023 Joanne Choi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.DOBCR.2020.01.01

Close