Cognitive Neuroscience of Conscious Dreaming: Investigating Methodological Approaches to Detect Dream Lucidity in Sleep Studies

Cognitive Neuroscience of Conscious Dreaming: Investigating Methodological Approaches to Detect Dream Lucidity in Sleep Studies

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal's area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for researchers?

A: Good

 

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Good

 

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

 

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

 

Tools and Methods

Q: Are the methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Good

 

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them coherent?

A: Good

 

Comments: The authors state that due to the rarity, lucid dreams are challenging to investigate, but patients can be trained to induce them and experience them on a regular basis. Further, the research says that narcoleptic patients seem to have a higher frequency of lucid dreams for reasons that are not yet identified. The potential benefits of gaining self-awareness during traumatic, recurring nightmares could be investigated for its therapeutic usage to ease the suffering of narcoleptic patients. Lastly, the research suggests that further studies with more subjects involved will be vital for statistical procedures to enable between-subject comparisons and important for investigating the effectiveness of various clinical and non-clinical applications.

 

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Good

 

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

 

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate for the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

 

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legends and notations clear?

A: Not applicable

 

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Good

 

Further comments on the paper

Comments: The study aimed at evaluating the approaches practiced during dream lucidity sleep experiments and suggested new methodologies and protocols that can be adopted in the detection of the emergence of self-awareness during sleep. Authors suggest further studies for investigating the clinical and non-clinical applications of lucid dreaming. The research also shows that diagnostic indications of emerging self-awareness based on more accurate neuroimaging protocols could be therapeutically applicable to conditions like anesthesia awareness and locked-in syndrome.

 

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions or clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team

 

 
 

Author Info

Corresponding Author
Berenika Maciejewicz
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Einstein Medical Institute, Florida, USA

Article Info

Article Type
Research Article
Publication history
Received: Thu 13, Oct 2022
Accepted: Wed 16, Nov 2022
Published: Thu 24, Nov 2022
Copyright
© 2023 Berenika Maciejewicz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.NNB.2022.04.03