Cesarean Delivery in the Bronchoscopy Suite in a Patient with an Anterior Mediastinal Mass

Cesarean Delivery in the Bronchoscopy Suite in a Patient with an Anterior Mediastinal Mass

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Good

 

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Good

 

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

 

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

 

Tools and Methods

Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Good

 

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Good

 

Comments: The Discussion highlights the challenges of the rare and complicated condition of mediastinal masses with pregnancy. This further discusses the anaesthetic procedure followed for the cesarean delivery providing relevant literature. The potential risk factors for mediastinal masses are also discussed in the report. The Conclusion states that the complicated case of mediastinal mass must involve multidisciplinary team approach and collaboration for proper evaluation and to ensure the right anaesthetic.

 

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Good

 

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

 

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

 

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Good

 

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Good

Comments: There are few errors found in the manuscript which are as follows:

·       In Case report, 2nd paragraph, 5th sentence, “A cat scan was performed” must be written as “A CAT scan was performed.”

·       Under Discussion, 4th paragraph, 2nd sentence, “This can occur not only during induction but also maintenance” can be rewritten as “This can occur not only during induction but also during maintenance.”

 

Further comments on the paper

Comments: The manuscript presents a case of cesarean delivery performed in the bronchoscopy suite followed by bronchoscopic airway evaluation in a 33-year-old female at 33 weeks gestation with symptomatic anterior mediastinal mass. The management of the whole procedure is illustrated in this case report.

 

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team

 
 

Author Info

Corresponding Author
Ursula Galway
Department of General Anesthesia, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Article Info

Article Type
Case Report
Publication history
Received: Fri 23, Apr 2021
Accepted: Mon 10, May 2021
Published: Mon 31, May 2021
Copyright
© 2021 Ursula Galway. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.31487/j.SCR.2021.05.05