Penile Prosthesis Placement with Immediate Buried Penis Correction: A Retrospective Chart Review
Penile Prosthesis Placement with Immediate Buried Penis Correction: A Retrospective Chart Review
Review Data
Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for
researchers?
A: Excellent
Abstract & Keywords
Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?
A: Very good
Goal
Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?
A: Good
Structure
Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?
A: Very good
Tools and Methods
Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?
A: Excellent
Discussion & Conclusion
Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?
A: Excellent
Comments: The case description is adequate. The Discussion section, with the help of adequate relevant literature, illustrates the importance of penile prosthesis placement to treat buried penis by increasing the penile size, thus, significantly improves the erectile function and overall patient satisfaction.
Literature
Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?
A: Very good
Author's knowledge
Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?
A: Very good
Length
Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?
A: Good
Figures & Tables
Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?
A: Excellent
Comments: Figure 2B is mentioned twice in the text section of the manuscript. Figure 2B indicating “the same patient 12 months after surgery” should be replaced with Figure 2C, as provided in the figure legend.
Writing style
Q: Is it clear and understandable?
A: Good
Further comments on the paper
Comments: This case series presents cases of buried penis and erectile dysfunction in 6 adult patients. This study highlights the significance of penile prosthesis placement, a combined surgical treatment approach which include penile prosthesis, ventral phalloplasty, penile suspensory ligament release and suprapubic lipectomy in order to improve the cosmetic appearance of a buried penis, erectile function and the patients’ psychological satisfaction.
The title of the article is already present in the literature. Therefore, the title of the article should be modified. The modified title should be “Penile Prosthesis Placement with Immediate Buried Penis Correction: A Retrospective Chart Review”.
Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?
A: Yes - Suitable to be published
If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.
Thanks,
Science Repository Team
Science Repository This email is restricted to the intended user. |
Science Repository - Support |
Author Info
Christopher J. Salgado Genesis Navas Lalama Maria Lindsay M. Tanner Edward Gheiler
Corresponding Author
Christopher J. SalgadoConstructive Surgery Associates, Miami, Florida, USA
Article Info
Article Type
Case SeriesPublication history
Received: Sat 16, Jan 2021Accepted: Mon 01, Feb 2021
Published: Mon 22, Feb 2021
Copyright
© 2023 Christopher J. Salgado. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.SCR.2021.02.11