Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Two Different Surgical Approaches to Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy with Urinary Diversion for Invasive Bladder Cancer

Review Data

Purpose and Significance of Study: This is comparative analysis of the efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of laparoscopic radical cystectomy + extraperitoneal bilateral ureterocutaneostomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy + ileal cystoplasty (Bricker procedure) in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer. However, the long-term studies using larger samples are needed.

Fit with Scope of Journal: The manuscript is of very high interest for the Journal of Surgical Oncology.

The manuscript contains a few minor errors (already corrected in the galley proof, except the highlighted ones, which requires the author’s attention), which are listed below –

 

The common ones are –

·       “extraperitoneal” must always be written as a single word without hyphen to maintain consistency.

·       Omission of “,”, e.g., after “tolerance” in the 1^st sentence of Results in the Abstract, before and after “according to cytoscopy” in the 7^th sentence of Clinical Data in the Materials and Methods, and so on.

·       Omission of “the”, e.g., before “number” in the 9^th sentence of Clinical Data in the Materials and Methods, before “surface” in the 5^th sentence of the 1^st paragraph of Surgical Methods in the Materials and Methods, and so on.

The other errors are –

In the Materials and Methods –

  Under Surgical Methods –

  In the last paragraph –

·       In the 3^rd sentence, “ananastomat” does not make sense; hence, it must be replaced.

·       The 7^th sentence is incorrectly constructed; hence, it must be replaced with “Bilateral ureters were anastomosed with an ileum loop with the seromuscular layer embedded and fixed, approximately 2.0 cm of skin, subcutaneous and muscular layers were removed from McBurney’s point, aponeurosis was cross-cut, the neobladder distal was put as fistula, and it was fixed at the McBurney’s point; the mucous membrane of the neobladder output channel distal needed to be turned outward into a nipple”.

In the Discussion –

  In the 1^st paragraph –

·       In the 9^th sentence, “Indiana pouch” is misspelled.

·       In the 13^th sentence, “diversion” must be replaced with “diversions”.

Author Info

Bowen Tang Shenglin Gao Jiasheng Chen Chao Lu Xingyu Wu Weijiang Mao Li-feng Zhang Li Zuo

Corresponding Author

Li-feng Zhang
Department of Urology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China

Article Info

Article Type

Research Article

Publication history

Received: Mon 27, Apr 2020
Accepted: Tue 12, May 2020
Published: Fri 29, May 2020

Copyright

© 2023 Li-feng Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.JSO.2020.03.06