Factors in Post-Operative Implant Cervical Burnout: A Retrospective Review

Factors in Post-Operative Implant Cervical Burnout: A Retrospective Review

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Good

 

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Good

 

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

 

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

 

Tools and Methods

Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Good

 

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Good

 

Comments: The Discussion describes the study in the determination of the contributing factors and causes of crestal bone loss in dental implants. The authors reviewed the various related medical histories of the patients providing relevant literature. Further, it highlights the limitations of the study. The Conclusion puts forth the potential direction to develop a measure of total implant bone loss to represent implant success or failure accurately.

 

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Good

 

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

 

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

 

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Good

 

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Good

 

Comments: Word “examined” was misspelled as “exaimed”.

 

Further comments on the paper

Comments: The manuscript evaluates the factors of post-operative implant cervical burnout in a retrospective population study. The purpose of the study highlights the factors that caused the greatest impact on the implanted cervical bone health. The study briefly illustrates the statistical analysis of several correlates of bone loss, demographics, site of implant, brand of implant, secondary procedures and mechanical complications.

 

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team 

 
 

Author Info

Corresponding Author
Alexander Faigen
PGY-2 Resident, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA

Article Info

Article Type
Review Article
Publication history
Received: Fri 21, Jan 2022
Accepted: Tue 08, Feb 2022
Published: Sat 05, Mar 2022
Copyright
© 2021 Alexander Faigen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.DOBCR.2022.01.02