Intestinal Obstruction Due to Titanium Tack after TAPP Inguinal Hernia Repair

A B S T R A C T

Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a rare complication. It is generally associated to a failure of the peritoneal gap closure with intestinal loops passing through the gap.
Case Presentation: We report a case of SBO secondary to titanium tack after 2 weeks of laparoscopic TAPP repair managed by laparoscopic approach, and we update some considerations about this unfortunate complication.
Conclusion: SBO due to mechanical fixation devices utilized in laparoscopic TAPP repairs is infrequent. In case of closing of peritoneal gap with tacks, those with low exposition profile and absorbable should be preferred.

Keywords

Inguinal hernia, laparoscopic, tack, small bowel obstruction

Background

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become a widely accepted technique since its inception in 1990 due to the benefits of the minimally invasive approach [1]. Both transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques use any medium for mesh fixation such as non-resorbable or resorbable tacks, sutures, staples or more recently implemented fibrin sealant. The TAPP technique also requires the closure of the peritoneal gap to avoid contact of the mesh with the intra-abdominal content and the closure could be performed mainly with sutures or tacks. Small bowel obstruction (SBO) after TAPP repair is a rare entity and several causes has been related to this unfortunate complication as inadequate closure of the peritoneal gap, hernia at the trocar site, adhesions or tacker lost in the abdominal cavity [2, 3].

Case Presentation

A 61-year-old male patient was referred to our institution. He presented with abdominal pain of 72 hours evolution associated to vomiting and constipation. Physical examination revealed a swollen abdomen with tenderness at hypogastric area. History records showed bilateral inguinal hernioplasty TAPP performed in another center 15 days before. Blood tests were normal. Abdominal radiograph showed a significant dilatation of small bowel loops. In addition, several images of spiral tacks were evidenced in both groins (Figure 1A). It was suspected a mechanical SBO, and a computed tomography was requested. Dilated small bowel loops with an abrupt change of ileal loop caliber at the level of the right iliac fossa, and moderate amount of free fluid were observed (Figure 1B). Based on these findings a nasogastric tube was placed and laparoscopic exploration was decided. A Hasson’s technique was used for the umbilical trocar placement. The abdominal cavity was examined, showing a small bowel loop attached to the protruding part of the titanium tack (Figure 2). Dilated bowel loops proximal to this transition point was observed. Soft adhesions were freeing with blunt maneuvers, and at the transitional point, a firm adhesion which attached the bowel loop to the tack was taken down with scissors. Correct intestinal vitality was confirmed, and it was observed that several tacks were used for closing the peritoneal flaps of the TAPP repair. Only, the titanium tack at the transitional point was removed. The patient had an uneventful postoperative, and he was discharged on the 4th postoperative day.

Figure 1: A) Abdominal X-Ray showing significant dilated small bowel loops, and several images of spiral tacks in both groins. B) Double-contrast computed tomography scan: categorical change in bowel caliber at the transition zone (arrow).

Figure 2: Laparoscopic view showing the firm adherence which binds the titanium tack to the small bowel loop.

Discussion

The intestinal occlusion after TAPP repair is rare (0.2-0.5%) and is associated with an inadequate closure of the peritoneal gap, hernia at the trocar site, adhesions or tack lost in the abdominal cavity [2, 3]. The importance of closing the peritoneal gap in the TAPP technique has been well documented. The closure is necessary for avoiding the mesh contact to the abdominal viscera, and it has been described several ways of closure such as staples, tacks or sutures. Kapiris et al. have shown a reduction in the incidence of intestinal obstruction from 0.8% to 0.1% by changing the closure of the peritoneal flap from staples to continuous sutures [2].

Mechanical fixation with tacks is the most common manner of mesh fixation in TAPP repairs. In addition, tacks could be utilized to close de peritoneal gap as they could reduce operative time. On the other hand, tacks have been related to complications such as postoperative chronic pain secondary to nerve entrapment, or adherences with volvulus and intestinal perforation [3-6]. To reduce adverse events related to tacking, it has been proposed the utilization of absorbable tacks that could perform similar and will reduce chronic complications [7]. In this case, the titanium tack utilized has high exposition profile after deployment compared to other available tacks. Based on its adequate performance and availability, it is probably that titanium tacks are the most common mechanical fixation utilized. Despite of the low incidence of this entity, the tack exposition should be avoided by covering it with peritoneum. It has assumed that the reaction of a foreign body is directly proportional to the amount of foreign material, thus, the contact surface of the tack could play an important role in adherences development [8].

Conclusion

A case of SBO due to a tack lost into the abdominal cavity has been described [3]. However, to our knowledge, a deployed tack after TAPP repair has not been previously reported as a cause of SBO. The notion that those tacks represent an innocuous situation should be abandoned. In addition, at the time of closing the peritoneum gap with tacks, absorbable tacks with low exposition profile should be considered.

Acknowledgment

None.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The institutional review board (IRB) approved this study. The patient provided written informed consent; patient anonymity has been preserved, and personal information has been protected.

Consent for Publication

Informed consent was obtained from the patient to describe the clinical course in a case report.

Competing Interests

None.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets analysed in the current study are not publicly available, because they contain information that may compromise the privacy of the patient but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: Angeramo CA, Sadava EE; data acquisition: Angeramo CA, Sadava EE; analysis and interpretation of data: Angeramo CA, Sadava EE; drafting of manuscript: Angeramo CA, Sadava EE; critical revision of manuscript: Angeramo CA, Sadava EE.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Funding

None.

Abbreviation

TAPP: Transabdominal Preperitoneal
TEP: Totally Extraperitoneal
SBO: Small Bowel Obstruction

Article Info

Article Type
Case Report
Publication history
Received: Mon 26, Apr 2021
Accepted: Sat 14, Aug 2021
Published: Fri 20, Aug 2021
Copyright
© 2021 Emmanuel E. Sadava. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.31487/j.SCR.2021.08.07

Author Info

Corresponding Author
Emmanuel E. Sadava
Division of Abdominal Wall Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Figures & Tables

Science Repository

Figure 1: A) Abdominal X-Ray showing significant dilated small bowel loops, and several images of spiral tacks in both groins. B) Double-contrast computed tomography scan: categorical change in bowel caliber at the transition zone (arrow).


Science Repository

Figure 2: Laparoscopic view showing the firm adherence which binds the titanium tack to the small bowel loop.



References

1.     McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J et al. (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9: 1-203. [Crossref]

2.     Kapiris SA, Brough WA, Royston CM, O'Boyle C, Sedman PC (2001) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017patients. Surg Endosc 15: 972-975. [Crossref]

3.     Fitzgerald HL, Orenstein SB, Novitsky YW (2010) Small bowel obstruction owing to displaced spiral tack after laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20: e132-e135. [Crossref]

4.     Peach G, Tan LC (2008) Small bowel obstruction and perforation due to a displaced spiral tacker: a rare complication of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 12: 303-305. [Crossref]

5.     Lantis JC 2nd, Schwaitzberg SD (1999) Tack entrapment of the ilioinguinal nerve during laparoscopic hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9: 285-289. [Crossref]

6.     Withers L, Rogers A (2006) A spiral tack as a lead point for volvulus. JSLS 10: 247-249. [Crossref]

7.     Sadava EE, Krpata DM, Gao Y, Schomisch S, Rose MJ et al. (2013) Laparoscopic mechanical fixation devices: does firing angle matter? Surg Endosc 27: 2076-2081. [Crossref]

8.  Gungor B, Malazgirt Z, Topgül K, Gök A, Bilgin M et al. (2010) Comparative evaluation of adhesions to intraperitoneally placed fixation materials: a laparoscopic study in rats: adhesions to fixation materials. Indian J Surg 72: 475-480. [Crossref]