Table 1: Baseline demographic
with periodontitis and other conventional risk factor among cases and control
group.
|
CAD present |
CAD not present |
Total |
P value |
Total |
N=30(%) |
N=110(%) |
N=140 |
|
Percentage N=140(%) |
21.4% |
78.6% |
100.0% |
|
Sex |
||||
Male |
28(93.3%) |
95(86.6%) |
123 |
0.53 |
|
20% |
86.3% |
87.8% |
|
Female |
2(6.6%) |
15(13.6%) |
17 |
|
|
1.4% |
10.7% |
12.1% |
|
Age groups (years) |
||||
18-39 |
5(16.6%) |
37(33.6%) |
42 |
0.35 |
|
3.5% |
26.4% |
30% |
|
40-59 |
13(43.3%) |
49(44.5%) |
62 |
|
|
19.2% |
35% |
44.2% |
|
≥60 |
12(40%) |
24(21.8%) |
36 |
|
|
8.5% |
17.1% |
25.7% |
|
Literacy status |
||||
Literate |
23(76.6%) |
85(77.2%) |
108 |
0.99 |
|
16.4% |
60.7% |
(77.1%) |
|
Non literate |
7(23.3%) |
25(22.7%) |
32 |
|
|
5% |
17.8% |
22.8% |
|
Smokeless tobacco |
||||
Users |
22(73.3%) |
49(44.5%) |
71 |
|
|
15.7% |
35% |
50.7% |
0.05 |
Non users |
08(26.6%) |
61(55.4%) |
69 |
|
|
5.7% |
43.5% |
49.2% |
|
Smokeless tobacco
frequency (times per day) |
||||
Mean ±SD |
4.02+5.3 |
2.1±2.4 |
2.19+2.4 |
0.000001 |
Duration of SLT use in
years |
|
|
|
|
Mean ±SD |
6.2+7.95 |
5.4+6.6 |
6.1 +7.3 |
0.19 |
Quantity of SLT use (in
pack years) |
||||
Mean ±SD |
1.14+ 1.43 |
1.09+ 1.02 |
1.09+_1.1 |
0.05 |
Smokers |
16(53.3%) |
44(40%) |
60 |
0.03 |
|
11.4% |
31.4% |
42.8% |
|
Mean ±SD |
1.12+ 1.40 |
1.06+1.04 |
1.06±1.04 |
|
Hypertension present |
||||
Yes |
21(70%) |
44(40.1%) |
71 |
0.012 |
|
15% |
31.4% |
50.7% |
|
No |
09(30%) |
56(50.9%) |
69 |
|
|
15.9% |
40% |
49.2% |
|
Diabetes |
||||
Yes |
16(53.3%) |
30(27.2%) |
46 |
0.007 |
|
11.4% |
21.4% |
32.8% |
|
No |
14(46.6%) |
80(72.7%) |
94 |
|
|
10% |
57.1% |
67.1% |
|
Russell index |
||||
Mean RI |
|
|
|
0.01 |
≤ 2 |
3(10%) |
30(27.2%) |
33 |
0.04 |
|
2.1% |
0.7% |
(23.5%) |
|
≥ 3 |
27(90%) |
80(72.7%) |
107 |
|
|
19.2% |
57.1% |
(76.4%) |
|
Premalignant lesion |
||||
Present |
6(20%) |
13(11.8%) |
19 |
0.56 |
|
4.2% |
9.2% |
13.5% |
|
Absent |
24(80%) |
97(88.1%) |
121 |
|
|
17.1% |
69.2% |
86.4% |
|
Independent t-test
was used; bOne way ANOVA was applied.