Table 5:
Distribution of implant failure by implant brand (n=1931).
|
|
Implant brand |
Frequency |
Follow-up (month) |
Total implant failure |
Early failure |
Late failure |
|
1 |
Nobel CC |
477 |
23.6±12.5 |
32 (6.7%) |
32 (6.7%) |
0 |
|
2 |
Nobel Active |
236 |
20.2±11.7 |
8 (3.4%) |
8 (3.4%) |
0 |
|
3 |
MIS |
401 |
20.9±11.0 |
19 (4,7%) |
18 (4,5%) |
1 (0,2) |
|
4 |
Dentis |
46 |
28.4±8.7 |
6 (13%) |
4 (8,7%) |
2 (4,3) |
|
5 |
Hitech |
51 |
30.6±10.0 |
1 (2,0%) |
1 (2,0%) |
0 |
|
6 |
Revois |
54 |
32.9±4.3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
7 |
Straumann |
29 |
19.4±10.0 |
1 (3,4%) |
1 (3,4%) |
0 |
|
8 |
Straumann Active |
137 |
15.9±10.5 |
13 (9,5%) |
12 (8,8%) |
1 (0,7) |
|
9 |
Osstem |
137 |
17.3±5.5 |
4 (2,9%) |
4 (2,9%) |
0 |
|
10 |
Osstem Active |
47 |
15.4±5.0 |
2 (4,3%) |
2 (4,3%) |
0 |
|
11 |
Dentium |
15 |
15.6±10.4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
12 |
Ritter |
150 |
14.8±6.9 |
25 (16,7%) |
22 (14,7%) |
3 (2,0) |
|
13 |
Neo |
151 |
14.2±10.5 |
7 (4,3%) |
4 (2,6%) |
3 (2,0) |